Valuation Analyses (type an address → a client-ready valuation analysis)
a proof of value — every number with its evidence
Builds a restricted-use valuation analysis the way a real one is written. The
sales comparison approach lays the subject beside each sale in a grid — photograph,
address, size, age, major components, features, dues — and shows every dollar added or
subtracted with the reason for it, each measured from this market rather than a rule of
thumb. The income approach is net operating income ÷ cap rate, off signed leases and real
costs — and the cap rate is extracted from what buyers actually paid for comparable
buildings, so it is a second reading of value, not a rate we picked. What to pay
for your own target return is reported as a third, separate number and never put on the cover.
The two values are never averaged: both are stated, and where they part is where the
evidence is thin. Where we do not hold the evidence, the report says so instead
of filling the hole with a default.
Buyer details — all optional.
These print on the report and drive the what-it-costs and is-this-the-right-block
sections. Anything left blank uses the record or the live market number, and the
report says which it used. The buyer can still change the money inputs on the
report itself.
The buyer’s places —
school, work, place of worship. The report measures the drive to their
life, not to a landmark.
Newer sales describe today's market better, so the grid starts at
3 months and only steps back — 6, 9, 12, 18 — when the window you
chose cannot fill a grid. It tells you on the report which one it landed on.
A sale in the same building, gated community, development or HOA is worth reaching
for: for one that similar the grid looks back up to 18 months whatever you pick
here, and the market-trend adjustment restates it to today.